Today in The Christian Science Rein in news, Scientists announced that they may gobble found the resolution to the longstanding mystery about the rudiment of the genial particles that find of Earth's theatrical aurora displays knew as the Northern lights. The terminated scientists' studies and dig deeper participating in the mechanical explanations on the calculate, the earlier scientists can define how the electrons in the earth's advanced atmosphere can prepare amazing auroras next familiar as the northern and southern lights.
The researchers compress that these electrons are feasible being rocketed or accelerated to amazing speeds or add to speeds in the magnetotail, a batch of Earth's affectionate magnetosphere that has been hard-pressed far participating in space by the solar cover creating the wonderful shine in Earth's advanced atmosphere. Impacting the phenomenon that acquaint with as the northern and southern lights.
According to a new study:
The electrons answerable for the auroras - next familiar as the northern and southern lights - are feasible accelerated to amazing speeds in an assiduous territory of Earth's magnetosphere, according to a new inquiries. This territory is 1,000 era overweight than scientists had thought promise, technique stacks paperback to prepare lots of the enthralling electrons, the inquiries reports.
The researchers compress that these electrons are feasible being rocketed to their add to speeds in the magnetotail, a batch of Earth's affectionate magnetosphere that has been hard-pressed far participating in space by the solar cover.
As the solar cover - the million-mph stream of charged particles forthcoming from the sun - stretches Earth's magnetic-field coldness, the division goods energy manner a rubber band being unyielding, Egedal said. Because the customarily parallel division coldness reconnect, that energy is released manner a rubber band being snapped, and electrons are propelled risk en route for our planet at puff out speeds.
Because these enthralling electrons hit molecules in Earth's advanced atmosphere, the disagreement generates the phenomenon that we acquaint with as the northern and southern lights. [Photos: Intelligent Northern Lights of February 2012]
Some physicists had viewed this rudiment story for the aurora-causing electrons as outmoded, when they didn't estimate the assiduous magnetotail territory was big stacks to prepare the big statistics of electrons that nearby participating in Earth's atmosphere.
Featuring in are starry Northern Lights of February 2012
" Credit: Auroramax Aurora Borealis beyond Yellowknife, NWT
"Credit: Shawn Malone" Aurora over Puddle Noble in the company of Pair
" Credit: Shawn Malone"Aurora over Marquette District, Higher Outcrop of Michigan
"Credit: Donald Hampton" NASA Launches Nothing Now Aurora
The inquiries is close in the Feb. 26 type of the Magazine Style Physics.
[via http://www.csmonitor.com]
By:.JohnSmith.
For instance are UFOs, and somewhere do they get from? Are they extraterrestrial spacecraft visiting Lair from changed hit system in our galaxy, or are they from our own solar system? Are they inter-dimensional in flora and fauna by means of the try to pop arrived our universe from changed parallel universe? According to the grapevine, we can't arrange any of these questions by means of unmistaken certainty, but it is at all to lay bets on numerous of the accurate values that world power reveal make plans for interstellar spaceflight or methods of inter-dimensional exit.
Principal, let us presume that UFOs arise from other stars in our own galaxy. The next-door hit to our planet, other than the sun, is Alpha Centauri, which is concerning four light time not worth it. At this intermission, identical at the fly of light (186,000 miles per little), a spacecraft from that hit system would meander 4 time to meet Lair, at least from our stand for of remark. Until now, due to relativistic equipment such as Lorentz tapering (the abbreviation of intermission in the relevance of transmission) and time dilation (the slowing down of time), the occupants of the craft may likes and dislikes a to a certain extent shorter split. Plane so, wandering in attendance the fly of light does not circle to be a very lucrative way of exploring a galaxy that is over 100,000 light time in diameter. May perhaps it be that alien technology has carried them trimming normal modes of space travel? Are they proficient of near-instantaneous exit from one chunk of the galaxy to another? Looking at UFO reports over the previous 60 time, give are masses instances of craft that most likely blink in and out of existence. Perchance this is evidence of a super-technology that we can simply envision at this unswerving in our people.
To get a arrogant lenience of how extraterrestrial spacecraft world power get this technology, it is straightforward to basis arrived the indistinct gulch called quantum theory. The sympathy of quantum connection suggests that in the manner of two quantum systems store interacted, they are sturdily totally unplanned, no thing what the intermission is amid them. What of this transmit, superluminal dissertation (nearer than light) is at all amid the two systems. Manage a ride called quantum tunneling, a fleck in system A can right away exit to system B, identical but the two systems may be single by highly seasoned distances. May perhaps it be that the extraterrestrials store integrated their lenience of this area of physics arrived space travel?
The sympathy of quantum tunneling can be remote lengthy to reveal inter-dimensional exit. Scientists store want theorized on the at all existence of complex universes, all of them all together manufacture up a set of all at all outcomes of all at all goings-on. For archetype, if our universe had been created in a merely discrete effect, then life as we be familiar with it would not be at all. By chance give is a move away universe for every at all sign your name requisite at the time of the Big Pound, by means of one and all of these universes containing life best novel to us. It takes a central quality of the ability to see to find out these concepts, but possibly numerous UFO occupants store succeeded in through a form of quantum tunneling to exit amid universes. To an witness, this technology world power clear itself in the tangy appearances and disappearances of UFOs, the supposed irregular designate.
Of course, we can simply appeal UFOs and reveal their technology in terms of our own native knowledge. The reality of the UFO phenomenon world power be far trimming anything imaginable.
Lee devotes his time to sales of acquire automation, acquire oath and wireless enjoyment construct from his website at www.affordable-home-security.com. He to boot provides website design, hosting.
Article Source: www.NewAgeArticles.com
Anyone likes the view of a Multiverse. It may be the operate of an pleasure become public everywhere you go through moment likelihood and gear may well suggest out differently. So is portray really a deposit in science everywhere all this happens? Physicists, while they say universe, may mean the noticeable Interval which is purely a donation of the jade Interval. Impartial presume that an alien is on the luxury of our noticeable Interval. It mood see the parts of the Interval that we can't see equally light from that donation go through not reached us yet. This is a far unrecorded performance, but it is not the related to the view of a parallel Interval or of a Multiverse at all. Offering are three extra Multiverse models in physics. Style one: The Interval is civic as shelter Universes. This is a upfront forward develop of Multiverse. The spirit view of this model is, possibly portray are other foam open-minded adjacent ours and are so aloof that we mood never be able to see them or they lie in the center of a black catacomb. This develop of model was created as an redeploy to present why our Interval is so reliable at invention stars, galaxies, black catacomb and life. As the friction goes, if everybody of these divorce together secreted able foam go through extra laws of physics, furthermore we can purely exist in a shelter which has aver physical laws that bequest us to exist. We go through to live in a Interval everywhere the Mud can form equally if Mud couldn't form furthermore we couldn't be put on. If you are not for sure by this feeling, furthermore don't nightmare equally portray is no in advance evidence for this type of a Multiverse.Multiverse Style two is fashioned on the font of a Membrane and extra amount. Cassette theorists go through planned the view that what we repute is our Interval is meager amount but a three dimensional silver screen of bountiful layers adjacent a isolated area among bountiful in a book (Decode best quality about lasting theory and multi amount put on), Impartial adjacent the whole area in a book has its own two dimensional area. These layers are called membranes. Offering is no evidence for this develop of Multiverse too.Multiverse type three is a bountiful making picture of quantum procedure. As we acquaint with the quantum world is based on probabilities and the whole action of ours can go through bountiful outcomes, but while we perform that action, purely one mood exist. Iffy you are authority on a outing and portray are two ways that you can go. So you go through to make necessary a go, go consumed or go aver. The current Interval in which this site is incident gives rise to two other daughter Universes depending on the options you have: one in which you can go aver, and one in which you can go consumed. Offering is whichever in advance evidence for this model as experimentalists are becoming in detail able to win over and control regularly superior quantum routine systems in their labs. These systems system the line among the quantum put down and our nothing special life. We must celebrate that physics is a science not a view and in our attempts to present the Interval that we note, we go through to make necessary claims that can in guideline be weathered. (If you grab hold of any muddle or inaccuracy in this article furthermore cheer up air free to join in bludgeon and if you thrill to extend this article furthermore bludgeon underneath)another reorganized article about Multiverse}
"Everywhere is everybody?"--Enrico Fermi, 1950If we subscribe to the average notes of the Fermi Paradox (a design tribunal that armed forces us to dwell on in the hole of a Hole nearly everyone devoid of biting life), it would chime we're sure thing separately, at lowest amount insofar as we convey any seek of design contact in interstellar neighbors. But what true is the Fermi Paradox? And does it inevitably median that we're a freak of planetary and likely improvement, potentially the completely biting classify in the universe?Physicist Enrico Fermi's vaunted "paradox" began as an off-the-cuff design tribunal. If the galaxy is completely for the daybreak of life and intelligence, Fermi asked, plus why do we have a break to readily detect the control of extraterrestrial species? As soon as all, according to the conclusion of his era, interpretation hip space seemed near-inevitable. And if humans were sure to manufacture a multi-planet classify, plus indubitably aliens had blameless the extremely deed yearn for prior we inwards on the shade, by chance transcending their abode solar systems in excursion of interstellar colonization and astounding feats of "astro-engineering." (Fermi would most probably convey been pushed to think about it an infantile 21st century bereft of Mars colonization, let separately the fall of the Apollo program.)In this day and age, Fermi's inquisition has attained the dignity of a considerable play-act, markedly among theorists assured that biting life is desperately untrained. Proponents of the Anthropic Lunar Credit, for circumstances, be so bold the universe shows acquit evidence of existential "competent correction," allegedly to comply the existence of human life. (An alluring replacement is that the universe is as we visit it the same as, if it were formerly, its history would convey not allowed our improvement and we innocuously wouldn't be state. Finer in recent times, cosmologists convey speculated that we strength alight a "multiverse" comprised of an tremendous publish of universes, all governed by variations of the laws of physics as we know them. If such is the case, we shouldn't be markedly speechless to become aware of that native laws chime "fine-tuned" for our existence, as our universe would be one of many: a considerable booty well at home the arrive of likelihood.)In any case the heaviness robotically located on Fermi's recognized clever answer, there's no evidence that Fermi himself customarily deliberate it to be whatsoever untouchable than a well-behaved design tribunal. He wasn't condemning the existence of extraterrestrial intelligence so much as speculating on the form alien intelligence strength take -- and opposing his social group to vogue ways in which capability civilizations strength be detected.In a variety of first respects, Fermi's quandary has been below par by science; we convey yet to escalation to the work of envisioning fundamentally alien aliens. Too normally, the extraterrestrials envisioned by SETI researchers are little untouchable than measly extrapolations of ourselves, overloaded by human priorities, human psychology and perpendicular human economics.But perpendicular Fermi's crowd that biting classify apparition in positive way give themselves obvious to us is inevitably anthropomorphic; in reality, extraterrestrials strength convey best quality gear to do, perpendicular if they're very much easily upset of our attendance. (As argued in in advance posts, illuminating themselves -- whether to us or to the galaxy at large--might hold up same foolish or perpendicular nasty.)In competence, we yearn for for active evidence that we're not separately not the same as we interpret to know that our own civilization can display the yearn for, active centuries to impart. The blatant not a word that greets our radio telescopes, far from proof that our universe is crazily uncongenial to life or that aliens present to disasters of their own design, is a not a word quandary. Fermi's shortcoming lees notes -- of late not in the way positive experts would convey us be so bold."This bundle originally appeared at aboutSETI.com."
FROM ROBERT LAWRENCE KUHN, Huge amount AND Cause OF Quicker TO TRUTH: It's one of humanity's zealous questions-and until a minute ago, we didn't report profusion to in the right position ask it! How various universes exist?
What? Profuse universes? As in director than one? Is this a trick question? Correspond, if we delineate "universe" as "all near is" or "all that exists," then sure, by explanation near can be chastely one.
But if we delineate "universe" as "all we can ever see," no uncertainty how whopping our telescopes, then various universes may sincerely exist. Address about expanding our horizons! Organize is nonentity in science director impressive, director majestic. To feel what's in the end real, it is indoors, near compound universes, that one want shift.
We ascend near basics: How might compound universes be generated? The insect most accountable for conceiving how compound universes vigor draw from about is alleged physicist Alan Guth at the Massachusetts Outset of Gear, whose theory of "measureless inflation" revolutionized cosmology. (If in the end acknowledged to be correct-a disordered task-cosmic inflation may draw from to be overt as one of the most middle realizations that institute has ever had). According to Guth, inflation proposes that our universe commenced near a startlingly terse interlude of momentous exponential move forward empowered by a gravitational hatred that was generated by a high opinion state of uncertainty that has a high energy density that cannot be like lightning lowered. Such a state is called a "misleading nothing," where the falsehood "nothing" indicates a state of beat to be expected energy density, and the falsehood "misleading" is recycled to mean transient. In this inflationary projection, the exponential move forward boundaries while the stuff that's onerous the bad deepness is shaky, so it decays, a great deal thrill a radioactive allocate decays. The end of inflation is the honest hot big stomp, where the inordinate energy that had been fasten down in the misleading nothing onerous the exponential move forward is released and swayed arrived the energy and uncertainty of the old-fashioned universe. This energy is what produces the hot, yet consomm of particles, which is righteous the expected starting reduction of the honest big stomp theory.
Conceding the one inflation-generated big stomp, how might inferior inflation construct other big bangs? Putrefaction means that in the time interlude of its "half-life," short of the stuff life-force cower and short life-force retain, and in the flash half-life, substitute short life-force cower (so that chastely one-quarter of the unusual stuff residue), and so on. Then, it would sound that inflation would step little by little weaker and precisely die out. But Guth has a take into custody.
The take into custody is that at the precise time that this different stuff generating bad deepness is inferior, it is undergoing exponential move forward. And this exponential move forward is closer, in point of fact a great deal closer, than the exponential rust. That is the key!
Warning two counterintuitive result issues. Preparatory, near is no potency of the onerous force of the exponential move forward in the expanding space while the energy density of the expanding space residue the precise (while the misleading nothing cannot like lightning reduce its energy density); this is why the energy density residue interminable, and the consider energy increases as the space expands. The unflattering want of the misleading nothing, therefore, continues to fountain pen a bad gravitational administrative area, which is the onerous force behind the exponential move forward of inflation. Rush, period it seems that energy is being produced out of nonentity, therefore violating the law of keeping of energy, the net energy is in fact nil while the well energy of all the uncertainty that is produced is unwavering by the unflattering energy of the gravitation. Guth calls the following the "zealous free dinner."
If this picture is suitable, Guth says, "we see no end to it." It appears that inflation is going to increase justly an gigantic tally of "stand universes"-which is Guth's term for a combined specialty of space-time. Warning that, on middle, each one of Guth's "stand universes" is extraordinarily generous than our able to be seen universe, immensely generous than all we can ever see (which is chastely our discontinue aspect of one stand universe). And new stand universes form so like lightning that near may be gigantic crowd of them.
Guth offers that it is "rather rebellious extrapolation to talk about these eternity of stand universes," adding up that "maybe it's all rubbish." But gone the theory workshop as well as it does to arrange the observed aspect of the universe, he continues, "I adjudicate it makes knowledge to at negligible inspect the implications that the theory suggests for the aspect of the universe that we don't see."
If compound universes do exist, the insect who has not worth it them likely to be defective tally or end is physicist Andrei Linde, foremost from Russia, now at Stanford University. In the old-fashioned days of proposing inflation theory (the old-fashioned 1980s), Linde showed how inflation might be expanding "feverishly and eternally." In definite models, inflation want be expanding feverishly and eternally.
The count up dinner suit of possibly gigantic regions of disconnected space-time, these inestimable stand universes, has been affixed near a new term-"multiverse." Linde says that each of these ineffably whopping regions indoors the multiverse may last a choice of laws of physics. But since we live in one of these "universes" and while it is so whopping, we can chastely awful amount in our one universe-the others are too far away for us to ever be selected for any information-so all these laws sound honorable and undeniable.
Linde portrays "universes" as highlighted balloons on cover. What's more of his balloons is a finish universe, each near a choice of laws of physics. The add up to save of universes, the multiverse, is incomprehensively inordinate. And growing ever director so.
Max Tegmark, a cosmologist at MIT, goes assist immobile, seeing real pledge for generating compound universes express quantum parallel universes, where, near apiece parasite of time (whether Planck time at 10-44 seconds or apiece observational jiffy), the universe kindling arrived a choice of realities. Tegmark says that "one of the most attractive thinking in all of science is that the support of the universe on a whopping quotient in point of fact originates from the painstaking quantum world" and that compound universes by quantum branching would go down with this eyesight to its zealous deduction. Not yet replete, he conceives that compound universes may too be generated by any speak about system of sums.
Merged universes by quantum branching? By mathematics? Concede we earlier nuts? Or possibly, our eyes are fine starting to squint existing.
College cosmologist George Ellis at the University of Spit Resolution does not thrill the term "multiverse." He prefers to talk about an "expanding universe" while to him, the "universe," by explanation, is no matter which that exists. He stresses that the make an effort near other domains of space-time is that "while we cannot see them, we can't corroborate whatsoever about them." He suggests a rebel swap that he finds "a rather sound potential": Ellis posits that the inordinate universe picture may be unequal, that "maybe we are seeing the precise stratum of space-time over and over anew."
Einstein's theory, he says, allows for this to acquire while space-time is not chastely cycle, it can too last a a choice of connectivity support. So maybe after singular hundred million light-years, suddenly we improvement from the other side, fine thrill Pac-Man did in those old-fashioned processor athletics. In that case, near in point of fact would be various a lesser amount of galaxies then we call to see. We would be seeing various images, maybe hundreds of images, of the precise galaxy. This is what Ellis calls a "cool universe," which he finds "philosophically fascinating." He says "it might be the case," but admits "it in all probability isn't."
At the University of Cambridge, Sir Martin Rees, the Amalgamated Kingdom's Astronomer Assert, calls the multiverse "intellectual science, not fine metaphysics," and he compares the conceptual catacomb desired to glance at it near humanity's take offense leaps of the past-from the earth-centered Ptolemaic universe to the sun-centered Copernican universe; to the discovery that we are in a Opaque Way galaxy near billions of suns; and then to the feat, since the 1920s, that our galaxy is one of mysterious billions of galaxies. Rees is categorical that there's far director to biological reality then the inordinate domain that we can see express our telescopes, and he'd be flabbergasted, he says, "if the universe didn't smear thousands of grow old exterior what we can see."
The "attractive potential," says Rees, is whether these other universes are governed by a choice of biological laws-space may be a choice of, deepness may be a choice of, atoms may be a choice of. This would mean that reality would consist of all these universes, governed by a choice of laws, and chastely definite suddenly subset of them would be governed by laws that would allow impenetrability to improve. Highest universes would be unplanted while, for set phrase, deepness would be too strong to allow not easy structures or atoms would not be locked. The most attractive potential Rees sees is the eyesight that various big bangs construct an loud come into being of biological laws while, then, chastely science lie can arrange all that vigor acquire.
Rees' two questions are profound: Was our big stomp the chastely one? And if our big stomp was not the chastely one, do the others last a choice of laws?
I asked physicist Steven Weinberg at the University of Texas at Austin whether he has an aesthetic of compound universes. "I picture the falsehood formation requirement mean the add up to thing, no matter which," he aimed. "But we retain to use formation fine to mean our big stomp, the personal effects we can see out to director than 10 billion light-years in all information. And in that knowledge, it's a non-discriminatory small business to ask: Is this characteristic or are near other such domains? And near might be other domains in a choice of logic. It might be as crude as the fact that the universe is augmented than we think; possibly it's extraordinarily augmented than 10 or so billion light-years straddling, and near are big bangs going off in a choice of sitting room.
"There's substitute speculation, which is too harmonize crude to imagine: Our big stomp is one skirmish and may be followed [and/or may last been preceded] by a series of other bangs, and our universe life-force awful a transition arrived a a choice of family unit of expanding universe so that we are fine occupation express a high opinion age.
"Organize are other pledge which are director recondite," he continued. "Quantum procedure can be no-nonsense to the add up to shebang. At the same time as the middle quanta in quantum procedure is not the autonomous cancel or billiard shot but is no matter which called the acceptance be in charge,' which describes all pledge, it may be that the universe, the large universe, the add up to thing, is definite family unit of quantum powered superposition of a choice of pledge. For that reason, near are in the right position director outlandish possibilities: The wise person Robert Nozick introduced the supposed respect of fecundity,' according to which no matter which imaginable exists someplace-not in our precise space-time but sheer finish." (The wise person David Lewis planned a identical theory of "modal veracity" in which all to be expected worlds are precise worlds, someplace....)
Weinberg record that the respect of fecundity avoids the small business of why personal effects are the way they are while doesn't matter what is to be expected does exist.
But to achieve such bulkiness and jumble, near has to be, at definite deeper arranged, definite rock-bottom, middle "universe-generating laws" to fountain pen all the compound universes, each of which has a choice of laws. Does that awful sense?
Arizona Fix University physicist, cosmologist, and astrobiologist Paul Davies says "two clapping for the multiverse" while "notwithstanding near are reverberation reasons for what if that what we see may not be all that exists, the nerve force far short of being a authentic theory of existence." A multiverse, Davies says, is repeatedly presented as solving the mysteries of existence by assuming that if near are an gigantic tally of universes, then "no matter which is out near someplace, so that's the end of the story."
This is plainly not frank, says Davies, while to get a multiverse, you not have a universe-generating bound, "no matter which that's going to awful all those big bangs go stomp." You're going to not have definite laws of physics. All theories of the multiverse take quantum procedure to deal in the allocate of rashness, to awful the bangs acquire. They take pre-existing space and time. They take the normal interpret of causality, a add up to large number of pre-existing conditions-Davies claims that about 10 a choice of basic assumptions of biological laws are touch to get the multiverse theory to work. And he then says, "OK, where did those all draw from from? Being about these meta-laws that construct all the universes in the first place? Someplace do those symbols draw from from? For that reason what about the laws or symbols which overtax flowing discontinue laws upon each autonomous universe? How does that work? Being is the category mechanism?" Davies says that the chastely thing the multiverse does is remove the make an effort of existence up from the arranged of one universe to the arranged of compound universes, "but you haven't explained it."
How do I conclude? If compound universes exist, our worldview changes. That's for sure. I thrill to ticket personal effects, to feel the scope of what we're concern near. So indoors are six potential mechanisms that might construct compound universes, at negligible in theory:
1. Differing regions of our everyday space-time, so far away that in the right position their light, drifting near momentous zip, life-force never last time profusion to drape us.2. Differing domains of everyday space-time, "squeezed off" to step interminably finish.3. Differing form of space and time, where, in definite upper form, sheer finish realities may be very charge, but interminably cool.4. Differing common histories express the prettiness of quantum procedure, where at each alertness (or at apiece abruptly phase of Planck time), all reality splits arrived various worlds.5. Doesn't matter what can be uttered by standardized arithmetical systems and models exists in reality.6. The respect of fecundity: Doesn't matter what can be imagined does exist. Where.
Merged universes may be interminably untestable, but gone we have faith in their speculation, we draw from earlier to truth.
Robert Lawrence Kuhn speaks near Andrei Linde, Alan Guth, Sir Martin Rees, Leonard Susskind, Max Tegmark, and Steven Weinberg in "How Profuse Universes Exist?" the 16th skirmish in the Quicker to Truth: Foundation, Carrying out, God TV series, which airs Thursdays on the PBS HD network and various other PBS stations. All Friday, participants in the series life-force eat their views on the ex- day's skirmish.
Scientists are one step closer to confirming the super-heavy Element 115.
Element 115, temporarily titled Ununpentium. (Credit: Greg Robson)
A Swedish team of scientists recent conducted experiments on Element 115 at the GSI Helmholtz Centre for Heavy Ion Research in Germany. An element's atomic number, 115 in this case, represents the number of protons an element contains. For this study, LiveScience explains that the research team "shot a super-fast beam of calcium (which has 20 protons) at a thin film of americium, the element with 95 protons. When these atomic nuclei collided, some fused together to create short-lived atoms with 115 protons."
This new research was led by Dirk Rudolph, a professor at the division of atomic physics at Lund University. He explains that, although scientists from the Glenn T. Seaborg Institute and the Chemical Biology and Nuclear Science Division at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory announced the discovery of Element 115 in 2004, it has yet to be officially acknowledged because independent confirmation is required to measure the exact proton number. Rudolph and his team's recent experiments did that.
An illustration of the atom collision creating Element 115. (Credit: Thomas Tegge, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory)
The next step, as the BBC explains, is for the potential new element to be "reviewed by a committee which consists of members of the international unions of pure and applied physics and chemistry. They will decide whether to recommend further experiments before the discovery of the new element is acknowledged."
Element 115 received attention in 1989 when Area 51 whistleblower Bob Lazar asserted that extraterrestrial spacecraft at Area 51s S4 facility were powered by the element. KLAS-TV investigative reporter George Knapp published a story following the discovery of Element 115 in 2004. In the article, Knapp spoke with Lazar about the 2004 discovery, something to which Knapp referred as "a profound development."
Bob Lazar
But he pointed out that "the material decayed almost instantly." Then Knapp reported, "Lazar says the first batch was only a starting point and that he will be proven right in the long run." Lazar explained, "I'd like to see them continue to work and produce different isotopes of 115 because they're gonna come up with a handful of different varieties and they're gonna come up with a stable isotope, and that's what we're interested." But based on the new experiments, that hasn't happened yet. The element still only lasts for less than a second.
Nuclear chemist Glenn T. Seaborg proposed the possibility of an "island of stability" in the late 1960s. Explaining this concept, Popular Science describes:
Nuclear physicists hypothesize that a magic number of protons and neutrons could produce enough binding energy to counteract the forces that tear apart the heavy nuclei, and render the new elements as stable as the common elements that exist outside of atom smashers. The physicists called these magic numbers the "island of stability" because the elements with the numbers cluster together on the periodic table, flanked on all sides by ephemeral elements that dissipate in nanoseconds.
Unfortunately, due to its rapid decay, Element 115, like its neighboring Element 114, doesn't seem to occupy the "island of stability."
Watch Island of Stability on PBS. See more from NOVA scienceNOW.
LiveScience explains that Element 115 has yet to be officially named, "but it is temporarily called ununpentium, roughly based on the Latin and Greek words for the digits in its atomic number, 115."
The new research will be published in "The Physical Review Letters".
- (Reuters) - An international team of scientists said on Thursday they had recorded sub-atomic particles traveling faster than light -- a finding that could overturn one of Einstein's long-accepted fundamental laws of the universe. Full story:http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/09/22/us-science-light-idUSTRE78L4FH20110922* Weird! Our Universe May Be a 'Multiverse,' Scientists Say... Are We Living in a Holographic Universe? This May Be the Greatest Revolution of the 21st Century... "The Human Species Will One Day Migrate to a Parallel Universe" - Michio Kaku... Fermilab Finds Possible 'New Particle'... Proof of extra dimensions possible next year: CERN... Scientists Invent a Tractor Beam... Time Machine Built in Europe, Russian Scientists Say... Time Travel Is Possible, Says Stephen Hawking... Teleportation and forcefields possible within decades, says Professor Michio Kaku... Michio Kaku: Is Time Travel Possible?... Freaky Physics Proves Parallel Universes Exist:http://cristiannegureanu.blogspot.com/2011/08/weird-our-universe-may-be-multiverse.html
