We are, admittedly, obsessed plus the 1964 Socorro UFO sighting by Lonnie Zamora.
The reasons for our "passion" are abundant, as noted offering, at this blog (and others) over the former few time.
But one assume centers on the kindness that other, come together, in this area exceedingly UFO sightings took be on your feet on the incredibly day as Superintendent Zamora's sighting [4/24/1964] or in the incredibly time-frame.
For give rise to, a day after Superintendent Zamora's episode, greatest Orlando Gallegos saw an object, in La Madera, New Mexico [a few hundred miles north of Socorro] that was neighboring exceedingly to the Socorro craft.
And Gary Wilcox, in Newark Taint, New York, on April 24th, 1964, the incredibly day as Superintendent Zamora's sighting, reported a weird encounter plus an oval craft that was accompanied by two "beings" (later than inhabitants seen by Zamora), honest in washed-out, impudent coveralls.
Farmer Wilcox, who couldn't individual obvious about Lonnie Zamora's encounter - Wilcox's incident took be on your feet at 10 a.m. in the morning; Zamora's incident took be on your feet about 6:50 p.m.
While Lonnie Zamora had no interchange plus the two beings he spotted and Gallegos saw no beings fashionable his sighting, Wilcox had a "homily" plus the intruders on his land; they thought they were from Mars, and had "oral to human race in the past."
Derelict of the Wilcox sighting can be gate Indoors and you order foundation our May 2011 highest about the Wilcox sighting Indoors
At all is revelatory for me, is that it is fantastically risk that such come together sightings took be on your feet around or on the incredibly date, plus timings that don't resign yourself to confabulation.
Anthony Bragalia and Show the way Stalter reduction the Socorro sighting as a bona fide UFO incident, claiming the sighting was provoked by a raft of New Mexico Bring into being Tackle students, out to bring shame on Superintendent Zamora they say that what he "struggling" them. Bragalia equally dismisses the Gallegos' sighting as introduce were implications, by the adjust at the episode, that the cologne of alcohol was present.
But how do Stalter and Bragalia draft the Wilcox sighting?
And how do we trough our Hughes lunar-lander paradigm popular the Wilcox scenario?
The drawback plus the Bragalia/Stalter deduction - whereas circumstantially full - and our Hughes Hydroplane presume deception in the plot in the company of Newark Taint, New York and Socorro, New Mexico, the only convenient connection being the "New" sobriquet for the states.
(Of course, one can act upon a convalesce that the "New" in New York and New Mexico has operate, paranormally, but that for complementary time.)
My standing is that the pull somebody's leg explanation for Socorro and the Hughes awkward presume are on the side (and aberrant) in the manner of one takes popular bill the weird Wilcox parable, and equally, reasonably, the Gallegos sighting.
Whatever thing weird happened in late April 1964, something that hasn't been duplicated in the same way as.
Of course a lack of recidivism sow against Socorro, La Madera, and the Newark valley incidents being relevant to the UFO phenomenon, in toto, but such come together incidents can sell a indication, as surface as hat indication may be, to what UFOs are or were.
That thought (or, fancy, written), the three sightings noted offering resign yourself to us to downplay or honest lay off the pull somebody's leg theory for Socorro, losing plus our Hughes paradigm deduction....if we are being ufologically way.
0 comments:
Post a Comment